Strange human quirks (ongoing)

The links in this post are similar to the "Strange creature links" but are separate because...humans...actually...have...more...dignity than animals. Some might poke fun at surgeons too.

12/31/07: This poor child was born as a sort of incomplete Siamese twin. Her "parasitic twin" joined to her at the pelvis but had no head, leading to an uncanny resemblance to Vishnu.

Next: something you never want to happen, especially if you have a brain issue. These surgeons treated the wrong side of a patient's brain. With gamma radiation, no less! The unfortunate chap/chapess seems to be okay...for now.

1/1/2008: These people...well, I don't know what they were thinking. Trying to sell your kid...for 30 pieces of paper money, no less!

Christmas 1

I went to the Saturday evening service; the text was Isaiah 63:7-14. Unfortunately, there will be no Bible study tomorrow.

Theme: Christ in "exile" to Egypt, being hidden/protected from Herod by God. Previous chapter (62): God the bloody warrior, coming out of Edom, having put an end to the evil one. But where will we stand in the end? What about me? Turn to 63:7 for the answer; He is faithful (so "recount [His] steadfast love"), even if we are faithless. He doesn't write us out of His last will and testament, all because of this steadfast love. So next time, when you're in trouble, first recount your sins, then confess them, then RECOUNT HIS STEADFAST LOVE.

Look at verses 8 and 9. The marvel of the Incarnation, Jesus' life, His suffering, His death. And further: God, like a father (for He is!), carries us gently, over and through life's hardships. Yet we rebel. God is angered and grieved at this--if we persist in sin, not taking confession seriously, His wrath will come upon us at judgment.

Yet again--Isaiah reminds us to recount. Lay out your sins, then remind God how loving He is. God Himself will forgive and guide us (v. 13). Purpose: to make for Himself "a glorious name" (v. 14). Later: a new heaven and earth. He hasn't given up on us! We have His promise.

Eek! That's so revolting! Part 2

Not only do we have antimicrobial house products, but you can also get workout clothes (subscription required) that slay the beasties exercising with you. Reed Albergotti (W1) documents the new products.

• "Outdoor apparel makers began addressing the problem [of stinky clothes] back in the 1990s. Among the earliest was Polartec, of Lawrence, Mass., which in 1991 began spraying synthetic-fiber underwear with Tryclosan [sic], an ingredient that has been used in antibacterial soap. More recently, Polartec and others have introduced fabrics treated with silver, whose bacteria-killing properties have given it wide use it medical and military markets." However, since any silver runoff will likely pollute, companies move on.
• The new products aren't just fabrics with antibiotics sprayed on, either. The human race has now advanced to using "organic-based sources." Not to disparage or anything, but I thought that antimicrobials were organic. Like penicillin from the mold. Oh well.
• Before we get on to the good stuff, here's a throwback to the good old days of soap and water: "Some people think washing clothes in hot water and detergent immediately after working out is just as effective as the new treatments at killing bacteria and eliminating smell. "Just don't throw it in the hamper," says Kay Obendorf, a textile chemist at Cornell University. The sooner clothes are washed, the better, because bacteria begins [sic] to multiply after a few hours."

All right--here are the touted "organic-based sources" you'll be shelling (no pun intended) out paper-based money for if you're a workout type.

• Silver ions. These have been used in other products too.
• Bamboo charcoal. Evidently it's much better than ordinary charcoal.
• Coconut charcoal. Better than bamboo?
• Crab shells! Or, at least, a derivative of an amino acid therein. (Chitin charcoal?)
• Merino wool. This apparently lasts the longest--and you don't even have to spray!
  

Who really owns the land?

WORLD Magazine, in this issue's Quick Takes, published something that made me think immediately of Elijah and the prophets of Baal (1 Kings 18:20-40). "Cry aloud...perhaps he is sleeping and must be awakened" (27). Emphasis mine.

To solve a 20-year-old property dispute, an Indian judge is reaching out to a pair of Hindu gods. After having legal, mailed summons returned to him, Judge Sunil Kumar Singh put advertisements in local newspapers ordering the two Hindu deities—Ram and Hanuman— to appear in court personally to help determine ownership of a 1.4-acre plot in the eastern state of Jharkhand where temples to the two gods are located. Community leaders insist the land belongs directly to the two popular gods, but a temple priest claims the land belongs to him. Should the gods not make the hearing, the court will likely grant the land to the priest.

Man proposes...but will the *gods* dispose?

Dire predictions

In today's WSJ is a pair of articles about...global warming! The first, on B1, by Robert Lee Hotz, details how one is supposed to track carbon and why we can't find so much of it. The second, technically not an article, is a group of two letters (A11).

Gist of the first: Some carbon produced by mankind's existence "seeps into soil, vegetation and the oceans, where it can't affect climate so immediately." However, wildfires and droughts prevent some of this carbon uptake, resulting in great confusion:

"A quarter of all the CO2 that is emitted is going somewhere, and we don't know where," said David Crisp at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, where he is senior scientist for the $270 million Orbiting Carbon Observatory, set for launch next December. "That raises a lot of red flags."

Because of the problem of 'missing' CO2, scientists have been scrutinizing our entire continent to find out just where all the carbon is going, using an online system called, not surprisingly, CarbonTracker. Not only do we now have that huge system to deal with, we have an even more time-consuming (energy-consuming? Hypocrite!) system [emphasis added]:

NASA and the Japanese Space Agency expect to launch satellites next year to track global CO2 concentrations almost half a million times a day, in a more precise diagnosis of this planetary carbon catch-and-release system.

Lastly, all the wildfires are evidently starting a cycle of more CO2-less herbage-less CO2 trapped... But read on--the letters show a somewhat altered perspective. Emphasis mine.

Says geologist M. A. Kaufman in Spokane Valley, Wash.:

If one wants to join the crowd promoting carbon dioxide-caused global warming...delving into geological history doesn't promote the cause well. Historically, high CO2 levels have been a symptom of warming, not a cause.

There have been periods when atmospheric CO2 levels were up to 16 times what they are now, periods characterized not by warming but by glaciation.

Yes, you might have to go back 650,000 years to match our current atmospheric CO2 level, but you only have to go back to the Medieval Warming period that occurred from the 10th into the 14th century to find an intense global-warming episode. This was immediately followed by drastic cooling of the Little Ice Age.

Neither of these events was caused by variations in CO2 levels, but were most likely the result of variations in solar irradiance caused by changes in the sun's magnetic field.

Richard M. of Oakland, CA, hearkens back to when Time foretold global cooling (*gasp*)...

We should fear cooling, not warming. A warmer earth would be good for humans today, as it was 1,000 years ago. However, even more we should fear the unscientific hysteria that attributes all change to humans. Yes, we are putting a lot of CO2 into the atmosphere, but no, this has nothing to do with the modest warming we are currently experiencing. The Little Ice Age has come to an end all of its own accord, and humans should be glad.

I won't add any more.

We see through a bulb darkly

On the debate between fluorescent and incandescent light bulbs: two letters (subscription required) on A9 of today's WSJ. Both condemn Congress as silly for promoting the former; each comes from a different standpoint.

Writes Roger B. in Tucson, Ariz.:

...Congress has now dictated phasing out the incandescent bulb starting in 2012. Think of the hardships and costs that law will force on the public. Ponder your current incandescent bulb usages that do not readily adapt to compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) or others.

Incandescent bulbs can operate on low voltages such as three volts (flashlights) and 12 volts (autos) but compact CFLs cannot. No more flashlights...no more power-on and indicator lights on your auto dashboard and your large and small (coffeemaker, iron) home appliances...no more holiday lights such as on Christmas trees and outdoor decorations. What would you use for bicycle head and tail-lights? How about roadside distress and warning lights that plug into cigarette lighters or dashboard power sockets? Also mood lighting for parts of your home and some commercial establishments, since CFLs do not readily adapt to dimming...

While some of the above uses are for convenience, others are for safety and life-saving reasons. Although decades in the future scientists may develop other sources of light, in the near term we do not have reasonable replacements for most of the above uses.

Quoth Charles G. Battig, M.D. in Charlottesville, Va.:

Reflecting upon the editorial "Dim Bulbs" I feel that a more illuminating title would have been "Dim Wits."

Does Congress understand that their beloved compact fluorescent light bulbs are miniature toxic bundles of mercury just waiting to pollute your local land fill? Does the public understand that their conventional light dimmers do not work with these bulbs? Just read the warning labels on the package.

Practicality, utility, toxicity. Personally, I figure that if Edison invented the incandescent, it can't be all that bad...

Stopped?! Global warming?

On B8 today: The Informed Reader scoops the Dec. 19 New Statesman with a topic too good to pass up. You guessed it: global warming!

"Has global warming stopped?" is the momentous question that David Whitehouse asks in the "generally left-leaning British weekly." Although "the amount of [greenhouse] gases...has been increasing steadily for decades," the theoretically corresponding temperature increase has, according to government statistics of the US and UK...not occurred. Yes, since 2001 the temperature has held steady. Funny thing, 2001 was when Bush took office, wasn't it? Must dismiss that, though...correlation doesn't imply causation. Oh well.

And there have been the predictable negative comments on this research, one being that the stabilization has only been six years long so far. They conveniently don't mention that the major temperature rise happened from 1980 to 1998, "only" 18 years. Go figure.

Christmas Eve!

The text for tonight (Candlelight Communion, 11pm) was Isaiah 9:2-7, another famous prophecy.

Jesus, the Light of the world, shatters the darkness of sin! This is no generic spirituality. In reality, the darkness goes a lot deeper than our personal flaws. A lot deeper. We are worthy only of hell in our sinful state. But the very Son of God brings light into our hearts, destroying darkness.

The original context of these words, their fulfillment in the Gospels, is the people of Galilee. Here, the northern ten tribes were obliterated--only Judah had a remnant (Joseph and Mary were part of this, looking at their lineage). War (the second motif) has been won; the victor divided the spoils--the Messiah broke the rod of Israel's and our oppressors, the largest of whom is Satan. Jesus has shattered him! There is no more guilt-burden of the law! Its back is broken.

All war garments rolled in blood, burned in the fire. The boots Israel heard in the distance, burned as fuel. Now comes the beautiful prophecy: the Child, the Son, given to us, is Jesus. Our Commander-in-chief--a child!? The government of the Church--and of the universe--is on His shoulder. Heed His word every day of the year. Glorify the Might God who died for us and rose again. His kingdom will be eternal, just, and righteous. Since all of our works together could not pay for one sin, the "glorious exchange" (Luther) occurs--our sin is replaced by the gift of His righteousness. How? Answer: zeal (power mixed with love).

"In hoc anno Domini..."

On page A10 of today's WSJ: a lovely editorial that, although it has been reprinted every year since 1949, I have not noticed. I'm still trying to figure out why. Several noteworthy features of it include:

• It was written in 1949! by Vermont Royster. Go figure. Must be classic.
• The title is entirely in Latin. For you readers not familiar with Vicipaedia, I heartily recommend this surprisingly understandable Wikipedia site, entirely in Latin. The title of the editorial, for those confused, means "In this year of our Lord."
• This editorial uses a multitude of Scriptural verses, phrases, and allusions generally not found in today's Bible-illiterate culture. I will excerpt as many of these as I notice. Feel free to comment on ones I missed.

And now come the verses.

• "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's." This, from Matthew 22:21, is quoted in contrast to the portrayal of Tiberius Caesar's rampant oppression, taxes, and so on.
• "Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." Again, this quotation of Matthew 25:40 contrasts Christ's kingdom with Caesar's earthly one.
• "So the light came into the world and the men who lived in darkness were afraid..." Here Royster takes John 1:5 and tweaks it to fit the theme of Caesar-versus-God.
• "...the truth did set man free, although the men of darkness were offended and they tried to put out the light." In the following paragraph, Royster finishes the quote more properly.
• "Walk while you have the light, lest darkness come upon you, for he that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goeth." From John 12:35, and true in any situation.
  
• ..."[men] would think only of what they should eat and what they should wear..." Here is the central problem of society, that of mankind forgetting God and pursuing material possessions. Based on Matthew 6:25.
  
• "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage." Even in here, Galatians 5:1, I sense a wee bit of anti-governmentism, given the context of the entire article. Paul was most certainly not preaching rebellion to Caesar; as earlier, His kingdom is not of this world.
  

Failing science!?

I found something near to the heart of Vere Loqui and repulsive to his critics: an inconvenient article about the perpetual ID-versus-Darwinian-evolution debate. Enjoy the back-and-forth.

Traditions of Christmas, part 1

A special, two-part (hopefully!) Bible study for this season.

1. Advent wreath. Symbolizes eternity (circle) and strength (evergreen tree survives winter). Ps. 90:1-2, 1 Tim. 1:17, John 1:1-5. Tertullian (3rd c. A.D.) criticized because of the wreath's secular roots. (Then again, the Cross has Roman--crucifixion--roots, too.) Increasing lights through Advent--John 8:12ff. Three blue/purple candles = hope/penitence/royalty; one pink = based on gaudete ("rejoice"--Phil. 4:4-7) from 3rd-week Introit. One variation (not ours): prophet's candle = hope; Bethlehem candle = humility ("of the least of the tribes"); shepherds' candle = joy at the message; angels' candle = peace on earth!
2. Christmas tree. German pagan roots--Boniface chopped down the Oak of Thor; a fir tree grew in the roots. Evergreen characteristics--life (eventually in heaven). John 5:24. Luther added lights/candles = Christ as the light of the world (John 8:12 again). Fundamentalist criticism is based on Jer. 10:1-5 (decorating trees FOR IDOLS with shiny stuff).

A quote from Boniface:

"This humble tree's wood is used to build your homes: let Christ be at the centre [sic] of your households. Its leaves remain evergreen in the darkest days: let Christ be your constant light. Its boughs reach out to embrace and its top points to heaven: let Christ be your Comfort and Guide."

Next week: The Twelve Days of Christmas; The Christmas Star.

Advent 4

Almost Christmas! The reading for today was Isaiah 7:10-17.

The famous Immanuel prophecy (a case of double fulfillment): Jesus is God-with-us (7:14; fulfilled in Matt. 1:18-25). First fulfillment: to Ahaz, of the house of David (v. 13). He was one of the first kings of Judah to be an unfaithful servant; he gave himself totally to idols, even Molech (made his own son pass through the fire--!); he changed God's altar into a pagan one. He received the promise unfaithfully, while we receive it faithfully--even though our culture is just about as bad as his. He didn't believe that God is that powerful; Isaiah warned him that he was wearying God.

There is no middle ground. Either you are faithful or an idolater. Buying Christmas trees does not make it really Christmas--you must have CHRIST. Skeptics scoff--"there's no such thing as prophecy," etc. But from the textual and historical evidence, we know otherwise. Immanuel will shatter all the nations. We are gathered here because of Him--our hope is the same as Isaiah's and Matthew's. Be comforted. The Son of David is faithful.

Varied links

On my previous post about the Cuban blogger: several Iraqis are doing something equally brave (hat tip: Cao).

On a certain debate about DDT: three links (here and here and here - HT Cao).

To be continued...

A blogger of enormous fortitude

On the front page (A1) of today's WSJ: an article about a very brave blogger. Specifically, a Yoani Sanchez in Havana. It makes at least this blogger very thankful to have such things as...

• freedom to blog: "To get around Cuba's restrictions on Web access, the waif-like 32-year-old posed as a tourist to slip into an Internet cafe...which normally bar Cubans."
• more unrestricted Internet time: "Once inside the cafe, she attached a flash memory drive to the hotel computer and, in quick, intense movements, uploaded her material. Time matters: The $3 she paid for a half-hour is nearly a week's wages for many Cubans."
• a safe location: "While there are plenty of bloggers who dish out harsh opinions on Mr. Castro, most do so from the cozy confines of Miami. Ms. Sanchez is one of the few who do so from Havana." In the thick of things, she is.
• freedom of speech in general: "The problem is, saying what you think in Cuba can be dangerous...Instead [of saying "Fidel Castro" in public], they silently pantomime stroking a beard when referring to their leader."
• a URL (the WSJ provides hers: Generacion Y).
• the ability to blog from home: "She uses only public Internet sites, instead of trying to set up an illegal Internet link from home, as some Cubans do."
• even more freedom of speech in various kinds of media: "She confines her writing to the Web. Critiques published on paper are considered propaganda, while the Internet is a gray area."

Very, very brave. Let us be very, very thankful for the freedoms we have here.

Oddity

From Oddees (a blog about randomly odd top-ten lists of everything conceivable) I stumbled upon the "10 Most Bizarre Scientific Papers." In particular: this one about the supposed causal link between country music (second in my heart to classical/church music) and suicide. Accompanying it is the notoriously Photoshopped pic of President Bush plus a guitar, superimposed on a weeping Katrina victim. Read, weep, and enjoy.

Irradiation

Responding to a WSJ blurb (Dec. 19) about the U.S.'s attempts to safely reduce occurrences of E. coli in meat, Ralph W., M.D., writes a letter supporting irradiation. And no, it doesn't make the food radioactive AT ALL, contrary to urban legend and/or popular belief. In particular:

"Irradiation of the final product with Cobalt 60 or Cesium 137 is safe, effective and economical. It kills the bacteria and does no harm to the food. The process was approved by government regulators years ago but never widely used because of irrational fears of adverse effects..."

If you take an undergrad microbiology course, you will learn this, as I did. Shame on me for not thinking of it immediately when I read the article!

Oops! There goes my tree!

A.k.a. Confessions of a Suburban Tree Owner.

On page W14 of today's WSJ is a cautionary article about trees and the over-aggressive pruning thereof. Sad to say, even I, who avidly climbed trees as a child, am guilty of some of the "unkindest cuts" presented below (table in the article).

• Hatracking = "Lopping off major structural branches to reduce the overall size." Guilty, especially with our two overgrown apple trees in the back yard.
• Topping = "Cutting the main upright stem of a tree to prevent it from growing taller." Iffy; I have snipped the tallest tips of a front-yard maple. Does that count?
• Flush cutting = "Trimming a limb too close to the main trunk, which leaves the tree more susceptible to insects and disease." Very Guilty, again with the apple trees. Mostly it's been limited to suckers, but the occasional larger limb has been sacrificed.
• Tipping = "Trimming off the tips of branches to shape the tree." This is the first mentioned that doesn't kill the poor plant. Iffy; the apple trees to look nicer round, don't they?
• Lion tailing = "Cutting off all of the inner lateral branches along a single branch but leaving a small cluster at the end to create the appearance of a bushy tail." Not Guilty! This one's just plain weird.

You readers may say, "What in the world is the purpose of that post??" It's biology!

Midweek vespers homily

Yesterday evening, the text being Isaiah 8:11-22, especially vv. 16-17, I heard another excellent homily. Here are the notes:

"Make way for a God who is hiding" = Advent in a nutshell. In the reading, because Israel used "mediums and necromancers"--signs from the dead--God hid Himself from them. We do, too: we trust in our possessions. However, we ought to turn to the true signs in God's Word (chs. 7, 9, 11, 53) for the real truth. It has promise enough for us.

"To the teaching [Torah] and to the testimony [lit. to repeat]!" We're doing this tonight--letting God's Word fill our imaginations, rather than our own thoughts. [The music for the service included six songs from the Taize community.]

Seasonal (in)sanity

On the front page today (A1): an article about Christmas pageants and their perils. Normally I wouldn't post on this, except that several blogging cohorts have done posts exploring a slightly different aspect of this topic (Aurora: here and here. The Stiletto: here. MK: here.) The article, by Dionne Searcey, explores a sadly-funny aspect of this season: beasts conspiring (?) against us to ruin live Nativity displays. Some examples:

• In NJ, at Fellowship Baptist Church: "Mary and Joseph were headed for Bethlehem when the donkey hauling the Virgin spooked, bucked her and bolted. Joseph frantically jumped on the donkey's hind end but fell off and got caught in the reins. The creature kept going, dragging Joseph behind for several hundred feet before it finally settled down."
• "At First United Methodist Church in Tuckerton, N.J., two years ago a camel noticed that the thatched roof used to create the stable setting was made of tasty evergreen branches. It ate nearly the entire roof." [Mmm, mmm, good!]
• "[A pastor] was a victim of a sheep gone wild one year at Fellowship Baptist's living nativity, which still features a small flock of the wooly mammals. [One might question the wisdom of this...] He tried to stop the fleeing sheep by squeezing it between his legs and ended up going for a ride, backward, before falling off."
• On disturbing the flock: "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in Santa Margarita, Calif., has banned infants over 4 months old from acting as the Baby Jesus character. "Too wiggly," says a church spokeswoman." [Yes, the LDS accepts Jesus' humanity, but little else...]

Kinda makes you wonder how much you'll enjoy Christmas this year.

Distractions

The Informed Reader (B10, WSJ) scoops the Dec. 15 New Scientist on something all students/workers can relate to: whether having a certain number of distractions could actually boost concentration. Bracketed material mine.

For people who find it difficult to concentrate at work, some scientists suggest the problem is too few distractions [!!], not too many.

Scientists used to think that the act of concentrating itself might screen out distractions. But researchers such as Nilli Lavie at University College London [the sun truly never sets on the British Empire--always coming up with bright new ideas] believe that making a deliberate effort to concentrate isn't enough to filter out irrelevant information.

Instead, the brain becomes more engaged in tasks as the visual demands of the problem increase and effectively block additional stimuli. In practical terms, the research could be used to improve children's textbooks [or some certain college textbooks I can think of: for instance, the calculus text my father used when HE was in high school], or to add textured backgrounds or moving images to enhance dull slide presentations. [Or you could just have more interesting content?]

Interesting, no?

Weird link

A friend sent me this link (language warning) to analyze. Given its polarity, I'd rather not--just setting myself up for a slew of comments to moderate over finals week. Check it out and see whether or not you agree with the guy's logic (which, in its barest form, I do).

Advent 3

Today's text was Isaiah 35:1-10.

Today's reading is toward the end of the Law-word (chs. 1-39; the Gospel-word is chs. 40-66). But there are tastes of the other in each. Today: a breath of fresh air. Verses 1 and 2--the wilderness doesn't bloom! God makes it do so. It makes full sense only after Christ's second coming (our current lives are a dreary wilderness). After this age passes away, we believers will live in the flourishing new heavens and new earth.

Why Lebanon and Sharon? Both areas are/were idyllic, the pinnacle of beauty. Cedars, mountains (snow-capped, of course). Now the focus shifts to "weak hands...feeble knees...an anxious heart." Hope! Be strong, fear not. The reason: "Behold, your God will come" to save! Odd pairing of vengeance/recompense with salvation. The reason: judgment always accompanies salvation. God saves the humble but punishes those who oppose Him.

Jesus told John's followers to tell him what they saw (vv. 5-6). This is proof of His deity--healing the believing. All of our sicknesses (ch. 52). Relief for our earthly life ("burning sand") is found in the pool of Christ, the Word of God.

Verse 8--"the Way of Holiness." The highway to heaven is Jesus Christ. Read ch. 34--much judgment pertaining to the highway. Against the Edomites, brethren of Jacob. Why? They resisted the Israelites crossing into their heritage; they resisted God and His will. God made the highway anyway. He makes clean all who walk on it--even if they are fools (!). (We, who sin, are fools.)

Treasures of Lutheranism: a testimony

All right, I used the word "testimony." Oh well. We digressed a bit this week (yesterday); the one speaker (a.k.a. educated layman) I had time to listen to spoke on a touchstone of theology: the Lord's Supper.

Mystagogy is the entry into the mysteries of Christ, the means of grace (Word and Sacraments). Christ Jesus says, "Take, eat, drink." Christ comes to us in the Supper. Study the Words of Institution (verba); the Supper is neither a show nor a reenactment nor our work--it is Christ, forgiving sins in the consumption of the elements, a local, saving, real Presence.

Preparing for the Sacrament: sermon (Rom. 10:17); self-examination, clinging to Christ's Word.

Approaching the altar: there is no greater privilege. The Gospel motivates reverence.

Life-changing: it is the highlight of the week. Christ serves us Himself (heavenly nourishment) and mediates for us.

Keeling-Over Curve

Today's Science Journal (B1, WSJ) offers more evidence (?) for global warming...

• On the high mountains of Hawaii are sensors keeping track of CO2 in the atmosphere; the series of readings have been going on for 50 years. All the while, the graph of them (called the Keeling Curve, after a Charles D. Keeling) has been going up. In fact, the levels are at a 650,000-year high.

(Really? And we're absolutely certain of our calculated CO2 levels from bubbles in Arctic ice for the time before we knew about gases and things? But I digress.)

• Says atmospheric chemist Pieter Tans: "When you look at it, it is shocking how overwhelming the human influence has been on the atmosphere." Indeed, according to the record, "Fifteen of the past 20 years rank among the warmest years on record." The oceans and forests no longer soak up as much CO2 as we thought they would...
  

I am truly SHOCKED! Humans actually presuming to "be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it" (Gen. 1:28, NIV). Who says that the Biblical mandate has ever been revoked? Fine. Reduce emissions. But no excuses for a baby tax from this. Nor Kyoto.

Relaxed-fit genes

A pair of articles appeared in today's WSJ. The first: The Informed Reader (B5) scoops Dec. 12 NPR (National Public Radio) on the ethics of using DNA as evidence at a crime scene. The second: questions by Gautam Naik (D1) about genetic testing. This pair, coincidentally, comes as I gear up for spring semester, when I will be taking biomedical ethics and a genetics class. Ah, biology!

The Informed Reader:

• "In one prominent case, Seattle police connected John Athan to a rape and murder committed more than 20 years ago through saliva left on an envelope. A majority of justices on the Washington-state Supreme Court ruled that the collection method, which involved a ruse set up by police, was acceptable, though the dissenting minority noted that DNA contains "the most intimate details" about a person." Yes, it does. That's why it makes sense to some people that using DNA would be equivalent to identity theft.
• "A distinction needs to be drawn, [critics] say, between cross-matching DNA with samples in a criminal database, and more invasive steps such as using recovered DNA to establish family connections or medical problems." Good point. See the next article in this post for more on the medical-problems part.
• "DNA-technology consultant Chris Asplen, a former director of the National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence, created by the Justice Department, says using familial DNA matches doesn't violate privacy any more than connecting people through their last name." Then again, given the commonness of such surnames as Smith, Patel (in India[?], at least), etc., using DNA would be a much more precise way to match people.

Health Journal:

• Warning:"Many of the claims that accompany [genetic] tests are not fully supported by science." That happens when money-making tries to mix with medicine, no?
• Case in point: "Some companies test for traits such as a "sweet tooth gene," and then sell tailored supplements to hasten weight loss." Just remember that nurture, not just nature, has a large part in this and other traits.
• Naik explains the complicating part: "For instance, some of the most popular tests claim to identify a person's risk of getting a common ailment such as heart disease or diabetes. The roots of these conditions often lie in multiple genes [nature], many of which scientists think haven't even been discovered yet. Lifestyle factors [nurture!] -- such as diet and exercise -- can have an impact on risk, too. A person may also carry several other genes whose workings counteract the ill-effects of the gene being tested for."
• Quoth Stuart Hogarth, a fellow at the Institute for Science and Society at the University of Nottingham, England: "Commercialization of genetics tests at this stage is premature." You bet it's premature! Maybe in a few years...

So just leave your genes alone for now. If your bloodline has survived for a couple hundred generations, it should have little problem with a few more.

Faithlings

The Informed Reader (B12, WSJ) does another blurb, this one based on an article in the December Seed, about the search for alien life. You guessed it--scientists are still unwilling to believe that God created Earth to be inhabited and that the other planets are, well, dead. Quoth I snarkily: "But...but...that's pseudoscience...must not let beliefs interfere with the pursuit of knowledge..."

If aliens are out there, how should Earthlings go about getting in touch with them?

The question has provoked arcane but furious debate among scientists searching for extraterrestrials. Because scientists haven't picked up signs of alien life near Earth [whew! At least they admit that!], the debate is essentially philosophical, revolving around such issues as who rightly speaks for humanity and whether humans want to draw the attention of possibly hostile life forms.

A dispute erupted recently among scientists over an effort to draft a protocol for messages going from Earth into space, reports David Grinspoon in Seed, a science magazine. Several scientists who believe that governments and other scientists should be consulted prior to any space-bound communications resigned in protest from a prominent study group on extraterrestrial intelligence.

Meanwhile, the search for intelligent life in the universe continues. A few astronomers have sent signals to distant stars since the 1970s, but the first aren't expected to reach their destinations for decades.

A "protocol for messages." Hmm. Does this refer to the multilingual "Greetings from Earth!" messages that have been sent previously? Why would we ever assume that aliens have a language even remotely similar to ours? Are they our *evolutionary ancestors*?

Strange creature links (ongoing)

I'll add to this post whenever I discover news of some extinct or otherwise weird animal of interest, so keep checking it!

First: an extinct "tank-like mammal" (Yahoo! News).

Second (12/13/07): a very large dinosaur (Eurekalert). A snarky quote from the person who sent this to me: "To Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days
the earth was divided, and his brother's name was Joktan. (Gen 10:25)
Ooooh, drastic climate change and the world survived..."

Third (12/17/07): the world's largest rat/smallest marsupial (thanks, MK!).

Fourth (1/31/08): another rat-like creature (Yahoo! News), the elephant-shrew. A quote I can't resist: "Ironically, recent molecular tests showed that they are more closely related to elephants than to shrews, being members of a mammal group called Afrotheria, which evolved in Africa more than 100 million years ago." Cough. As I have said before, common design does not necessarily imply common descent. At the risk of being labeled ID (versus creationist), I put forth the politically incorrect proposition that this phenomenon implies a common Designer.

Mmm, mmm, good!

...for the bacteriophilic, at least! The latest on probiotics from AP (WSJ, A23):

CHICAGO -- Bugs in baby food? Microbes in your milkshake? This isn't the latest tainted-food scare -- it is a growing trend in foods designed to boost health, not make you sick.

These products contain probiotics, or "friendly" bacteria similar to those found in the human digestive system. There are supplement pills, yogurts, smoothies, snack bars and cereals, even baby formula and chocolate.

The foods are spreading on grocery-store shelves and dairy cases. They come with vague claims of "regulating your digestive health" or "strengthening your body's defenses."

Experts say probiotics, popular in Europe, Asia and South America, are generally safe, and in some cases might be helpful. It is a hot new area, reflecting a growing interest in how naturally occurring intestinal bacteria affect health. Scientists will discuss advances this week at a U.S. National Institutes of Health conference.

This year, more than 150 probiotic and prebiotic foods were introduced in the U.S.

Given that only about 3% of ALL bacteria/viruses/miscellaneous other microbiota discovered in the past century or two are dangerous to humans, this should not surprise anyone. Each of us is living in a sea of bacteria etc. There are more bugs in your mouth than there are people in the world! (this will be even more true if the enviro-Nazis have their way: see here and here and here and here)

The meaning of Christmas

Read this post (hat tip: Coram Deo) while planning your Christmas cards. More than a little sobering. I'm sure all of us can think of a good long list of people to share this with.

Advent 2

Today's text was Isaiah 11:1-10.

Isaiah here (and elsewhere--chs. 7-12) prophesies of Jesus Christ. This text dates ca. 735-733 B.C.--a mere decade before the fall of Israel; after 586 B.C., the whole kingdom certainly looked like a stump. The Messiah is like no other earthly king; His kingdom is like no other earthly kingdom, as shown by the reading. Not just a "nice" king, but Savior of the world!

Sevenfold Spirit--v. 2. "Fear of the LORD" = proper respect for the almighty God. By Is. 9 we are sure that Jesus is God. Liberation theology (that God prefers the poor because they are poor) is a misunderstanding of God's orders to defend the oppressed OF THE FAITHFUL. Isaiah condemns the materialism and injustice exhibited chiefly by the rich in Judah and Israel.

Do not remain in sin, for Christ will judge with fairness. His kingdom (vv. 6-9) will be one of peace and perfection. Let it bring joy and wonder to your life. But it'll be in the new heavens and earth, not in this present world. Best: we'll see God face to face! Saving knowledge of Christ (v. 10) has spread throughout the world, but right now it is imperfect. Later it will be complete and perfect. God will be glorified because of His banner, Christ Jesus. Gather around Him in Communion--a foretaste of the glorious feast to come. Rest in Him.

Treasures of Lutheranism in denominational context, part II

As promised, here is the continuation of this particular study.

• Treasure 4. Piety (how the Christian life is expressed). Freedom in the Gospel but constant confession of sin and reception of forgiveness. Strong liturgical emphasis leading to reverence. Not pietism (i.e. trusting in works, contrary to profession of faith). High church ("smells and bells" and ritual-heavy) vs. low church (e.g. American Evangelicalism--only after the 1940s or 50s). "Non-church" (low-ritual) churches are popular... Ephesians 5:21ff--submitting to one another (= piety) plus fear of God (= true focus; NOT ME-CENTERED, a.k.a. *contemporary*). Contrast traditional RC with Amer. Evang. in terms of the number of 1st-person pronouns used. God's primary relationship to us: Judge. Secondary: Friend. Reverent piety isn't living in fear--but we still confess sin. Apart from the Gospel, we have/are nothing. Have Law--or else, "freedom from what?" Prayer--some places may actually be inappropriate to pray in. Just keep worshiping...
• Treasure 5. Law and Gospel (Sola Fides--Eph. 2:8-9). Scripture properly divided by law and Gospel. Salvation is by grace through faith. Take them together. God condemns sin--yet He forgives sin! RC adds works and purgatory...a constant state of fear. But we're already God's children!

We should finish this up next week. Two more treasures to go...

Attempts at resurrection

"First it killed the Romans, and now it's killing me."

On a topic dear to my heart (W12): a double book review of works about Latin! Michael Poliakoff takes a decidedly kinder stance toward Ad Infinitum by Nicholas Ostler (at $27.95, it wouldn't make a bad Christmas present!) than toward Carpe Diem by Harry Mount. Hopefully, at least one of them will prevent translation abominations like this one (thanks, Vere Loqui!).

Concerning Ad Infinitum: The expression "sic transit gloria mundi" pretty much sums up the book, according to Poliakoff. However, this is questionable--high-school Latin scholars are "holding steady" at 175,000 for 15 years and counting (albeit far from 900K in 1934). "In short, the Renaissance is not yet in sight [so maybe I am destined to be extinct?], but neither are we living in the Dark Ages." Here's one item I hadn't known: The word "'glamour' derives from 'grammar.'" That in itself might popularize the language a bit...

Carpe Diem, on the other hand, is much "cheerier" and "assumes that [readers] are barbarians [rather than dignified Roman citizens]." Poliakoff opines that Mount does not grasp the full impact of "his quotation from William Hazlitt: 'The study of Classics teaches us to believe that there is something really great and excellent in the world...'" Among other things, the book includes a "tasteless description" of, shall we say, the immoral behavior of a Latin teacher; "doesn't to a lot to raise" standards in British schools; and leaves much description of characters such as Marcus Aurelius to be desired.

Latin is not for the wimpy. Be smart! Read dead languages! Join the few, the proud, the brave. (Oops...just borrowed/spoofed the Army slogan. But the strength of the will is the same either way.) Check out the best website I know of so far of this now-living language.

Of kangaroos and cows

To put it bluntly: kangaroo farts could ease global warming. According to the article, "Thanks to special bacteria in their stomachs, kangaroo flatulence contains no methane and scientists want to transfer that bacteria to cattle and sheep who emit large quantities of the harmful gas." Mmm...tasty! (Aurora, have you heard of this yet?) It solves this dilemma, apparently:

"Fourteen per cent of emissions from all sources in Australia is from enteric methane from cattle and sheep,'' said Athol Klieve, a senior research scientist with the Queensland Government.

"And if you look at another country such as New Zealand, which has got a much higher agricultural base, they're actually up around 50 per cent,'' he said...

Even farmers who laugh at the idea of environmentally friendly kangaroo farts say that's nothing to joke about, particularly given the devastating drought Australia is suffering.

"In a tight year like a drought situation, 15 per cent would be a considerable sum,'' said farmer Michael Mitton.

However...

But it will take researchers at least three years to isolate the bacteria, before they can even start to develop a way of transferring it to cattle and sheep.

Here's a solution: Forget about patriotism, just eat the animal already!

Another group of scientists, meanwhile, has suggested Australians should farm fewer cattle and sheep and just eat more kangaroos.

The idea is controversial, but about 20 per cent of health-conscious Australians are believed to eat the national symbol already.

"It's low in fat, it's got high protein levels it's very clean in the sense that basically it's the ultimate free range animal,'' said Peter Ampt of the University of New South Wales's institute of environmental studies.

"It doesn't get drenched, it doesn't get vaccinated, it utilises food right across the landscape, it moves around to where the food is good, so yes, it's a good food.''

It might take a while for kangaroos to become popular barbecue fare, but with concern over global warming growing in the world's driest inhabited continent, Australians could soon be ready to try almost anything to cut emissions.

Stem cell hope, part II

Progress has been made with the altered adult stem cells! Gautam Naik reports (B6) that, at least in mice, scientists have "successfully treat[ed] a version of sickle-cell anemia in the animals." This is only the first step in the vital experimental confirmation of the research. Still, we still must deal with "potentially dangerous viruses" that would be used to bring in the new genes. Also, "complex ailments such as Parkinson's will probably be far harder to treat, even in mice." Bring it on!

Really? We came out of the sea?

The Informed Reader (B8) scoops the Dec. 8 New Scientist. It appears that we have yet another evolutionary cousin...

Do dolphins have culture?

A pair of scientists say new findings that document male Amazon river dolphins carrying objects such as weeds or sticks in a bid to lure female mates is evidence of behavior once believed to be exclusive to primates.

While definitions of culture among animals vary, scientists generally label culture as behavior spread through social learning rather than by genes or ecology. Object-carrying by dolphins suggests a form of sexual display normally found only in humans and chimps, says Tony Martin, one of the scientists who studied river dolphins in the Brazilian Amazon.

Well, what did you expect? Either it's common ancestry or a common Designer.

Treasures of the deep?

The Informed Reader (B12) scoops Dec. 20's New York Review of Books.

Writes professor Tim Flannery:

Scientists know more about the surface of the moon than about life on the ocean floor...much of [ocean life] is threatened by the persistent notion that such distant zones are largely empty and have little connection to human activity.

Humans have bombarded the depths for years with chemical weapons, industrial waste, sewage and sunken ships . Meanwhile, trawling has brought some deep-sea creatures to the dinner table. "Like the sump of an engine, the deep is where much of the muck accumulates...But unlike a sump, the pollutants of the deep don't stay there."

What goes down, comes up, I guess. Why don't people just eat normal fish? Shallow-water ones?

"Drink your milk" applies to everyone

On page D1 of today's WSJ, Jacob Goldstein reminds us that boys should drink milk too. Why? Men over 50 have, on average, a 25% chance of developing osteoporosis (granted, women's risk is double that). Some risk factors: increased age, lighter weight, "history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease" (COPD, for you acronym-happy readers), and "smoking and excessive drinking." Also, certain cancer-treating drugs (e.g. Lupron for prostate cancer) that block hormones do damage to one's bones.

Getting enough calcium and vitamin D helps. And exercise during childhood and adolescence, while the skeleton is still growing, builds bone. That's important because it helps raise the so-called peak bone mass reached during young adulthood, before the long-term decline in bone mass begins. "The less you start with, the less you're going to end up with when you're really at the age when osteoporosis risk is very important," says Eric Orwoll of Oregon Health & Science University, who is conducting a long-term study of osteoporosis in men.

Staying fit into old age is also important; it means stronger muscles and better coordination and balance, all of which help avoid falls, a key trigger for fractures in the elderly.

There is some evidence that the type of exercise -- weight-bearing, versus non-weight-bearing -- can make a difference for bones. For example, some research suggests competitive cyclists, who spend hours a week on their bicycles but little time running or jumping, may tend to have weaker bones than runners...

Some experts nevertheless say that the more important point is simply to exercise. "I have not been convinced that the tiny increase in bone density [from weight-bearing exercise] is really that critical," Dr. [Ethel] Siris says. "If my patients say, 'I don't enjoy weight-bearing exercise, should I swim?' I say, 'Yes.' "

Inconvenienced yet again!

Today's Review and Outlook (A20) made me smile. The U.S. is actually doing something right? You must be joking! But here it is... [emphasis mine]

Thousands of government officials, diplomats, NGO folks and journalists are in Bali this week for the United Nations' global warming powwow. While they try to outline an even tougher set of restrictions on so-called greenhouse gases to succeed the Kyoto Protocol, we'll venture that little will be said about America's record on curbing emissions without such caps. It's too big an embarrassment to the assembled worthies...

Output of all greenhouse gases was down 1.5% last year. All this while the American economy grew by 2.9%...

Critics immediately pointed to the Energy Department's acknowledgment that the reductions were in part due to higher energy prices and favorable weather. But greater use of lower-carbon energy sources, including natural gas, also played a big role...

We refer back to 2000 instead of 1990 because the real agenda of those who blame America's role in global warming seems to be to blame President Bush for not signing Kyoto. It's true that U.S. emissions have grown more than Europe's since 1990, but how can this Administration be held responsible for what happened on Al Gore's watch?...

Making 178 lists, checking them twice

The Informed Reader (B11) scoops Dec. 10's The New Yorker. The topic: Checklists for pilots are standard, so why not for surgeons as well? Saith surgeon Atul Gawande:

• "A decade ago, Israeli scientists calculated that an average patient on life support required 178 individual actions a day -- ranging from administering drugs to suctioning the lungs. On top of those procedures, doctors and nurses have to figure out how to cure the patient." Yikes! No wonder we're in a shortage of health care personnel--the ICU patients need everybody the hospital has.
• "The medical community has responded to complexity by increasing doctors' level of specialization." Wouldn't this be akin to having a chief navigator, assistant navigator, instrument expert, and communications expert, all in the same cockpit?
  
• "Critical care has become its own field. Yet intensive care's complexity might have reached the level that not even those experts might be capable of tracking all its moving parts"--a very dire prediction, indeed.
• "Tens of thousands of checklists would be necessary to cover the needs of every combination of medical problems." Yes? Couldn't we just train tens of thousands of specialists? *wink*
• "Yet [the] lists have proved powerful when applied to basic procedures, mostly through avoiding the one tiny slip that can make all the difference." Potentially one would need 178 lists...ah well. It's no worse than rushing and making mistakes.
• "A test at hospitals that belong to the Michigan Health and Hospital Association found that enforcing a checklist of anti-infection measures cut the infection rate at intensive-care units by 66%." Two thirds. Wow.
• And the clincher: "Had a drug or device saved as many lives as [the] checklist, it would be universally adopted." Ha! Sounds like a good analogy, no?
  

Advent 1

My church is beginning an 8-week sermon emphasis on Isaiah. This will span Advent (first Sunday of that season today!), Christmas, and Epiphany. The sermon text was Isaiah 2:1-5 (which, coincidentally--or not--I just studied in LifeLight).

Isaiah has been called the 5th Gospel--so much prophecy and encouragement. Three themes in chapter 2: (1) All nations will flow to the LORD's mountain. (2) Nations will not have war anymore (eventually). (3) Walk in the LORD's light.

Verse 1--Isaiah saw the word of the Lord, probably in a vision. "Concerning Judah and Jerusalem." We need to know our faith history. N.B.--ca. 1000 BC, Israel envies the other nations that have kings. God gave them kings, all right--warning them about the negatives. One century later, civil war splits the nation. After the northern tribes fall (722 BC), Isaiah prophesies. Around 500 BC, the remnant returns.

God's greatest trait is His mercy--but it didn't pay dividends with His people. His patience is running out. Seek His face. Judah fell too (586 BC), but not completely.

Theme 1. Mountain = Mt. Zion, Jerusalem. God's house. Also remember Calvary, a little hill on the mount--v. 2 fulfilled. 3rd mountain = the new Jerusalem.

Theme 2. Verse 4 is carved in the UN building--WRONG USE! Don't hold your breath--the Book says that only the next world will have no war. "Word of judgment"--at Calvary, an odd kind of justice. We go free while Christ bore the penalty.

Theme 3. Know His word, that He is the true God. Walk not "in quarreling and jealousy" (Rom 13:13, but in forgiveness in Christ.

The forgiveness of sins is truly central.

Arrestniks

Time for a second human-rights post: A13 by Garry Kasparov, former world chess champion.

Kasparov was jailed in Russia this past week for "disobeying the orders of a police officer" at a Moscow rally. You guessed it--he is a PIG (politically incorrect guy/Garry). As is typical in Russia:

• His charge was added after the fact by a Moscow district court.
• The KGB was after him--"we could all hear "make sure you get Kasparov" on their walkie-talkies."
• He and his cohorts enjoyed no right to his lawyer, nor true justice--rather "telephone justice" (mishearing the judge, eh?). The trial was a brilliant one-side play.
• He had to "receive food packages from home" rather than eat jail food--and this was only in response to "growing external pressure."
• Even his release "was handled illegally. Instead of letting me out...into the crowd of media and supporters...I was secretly taken to the police station...a colonel's automobile all the way to my home."
• And, of course, his cell was only 120 square feet--maybe the size of my bedroom, but not large enough for normal life.

Staged elections. Staged trials. No wonder Tchaikovsky is so popular. Sorry. Must not put good music and bad country in same sentence ever again.

Eeek! That's so revolting!

"For the microbe-phobic": a WSJ article (W7) about "Debugging the House." June Fletcher surveys several newfangled ways to kill the microorganisms threatening to kill you while you party. As usual, several of these items risk drug resistance - triclosan, in particular. Here are some fun/weird facts about these five innovations ('but microbiologists have known about these for years!' I say)...

• Silver ions--used in SilverClene24 (promoted on "a "Brady Bunch" spoof called ThatsRevolting.com") to disrupt bacterial "metabolism and reproductive capabilities." Even though it kills MRSA, it doesn't kill others such as the tuberculosis beastie.
• Copper oxide--the "oxide" part makes it much more effective. Do you want to buy a "copper-oxide-infused Cupron bed linens" set? Pricey like silver. Good against viruses, fungi, and "many antibiotic-resistant bugs." It damages the cell wall and prevents multiplication (but what about division? asks the mathematician).
• Steam--good old steam. Think of it as killing tiny, malicious vegetables. Whirlpool has made a steam washer--but you need several minutes of sustained high temperatures.
• Triclosan--this antibiotic is already in oodles of stuff: dish soap, anything with Microban (e.g. an Amana washer, a Rubbermaid high chair [!], Westpoint towels, a new "Bissel Healthy Home Vacuum"). So far, resistance has shown up only in lab tests, but it never hurts to under-use this. Find plain old soap and water. Your parents ate off of germy high chairs and are (hopefully) none the worse for it.
• UV light--in a Hammacher Schlemmer wand. This is essentially instant skin/DNA cancer for microbes. Be careful not to look at the light or shine it on yourself.

Or you could just ignore all this stuff and observe simple cleanliness methods. Besides, like worms and beetles in applesauce, bugs add protein :D. Bad germs are like Republican goofs--they get all the coverage, while the good ones/deeds get relegated to page 19.

Another North Korean atrocity

Time to do a human-rights post.

On A16 of today's WSJ, author Shin Dong-hyok briefly narrates his experience as a recent North Korean prisoner. Shocking? Read on.

"I was born a prisoner on Nov. 19, 1982, and until two years ago, North Korea's Political Prison Camp No. 14 was the only place I had ever called home." Chilling first sentence.

"Under North Korea's "Three Generation Rule," up to three generations of the criminal's family must be imprisoned as traitors." I guess the Great Leader takes Ex. 20:5b a bit too literally.

After being "tortured severely for seven months," he bears physical and emotional scars: "On Nov. 29, 1996, my mother and brother were found guilty of treason [he still cannot figure out what this 'crime' was] and sentenced to public execution. I was taken outside and forced to witness their deaths."

Why are we even considering this idolatrous regime as having a possibility of being good? This did not stop with Dong-hyok: "Today, tens of thousands are suffering silently in government-sponsored political prison camps in North Korea. Inmates...often fight with one another in hopes of getting one more meal...Women often undergo forced abortions and children have no childhood."

Dong-hyok writes from Seoul. "We must become their voice." Amen.

Too few Scrubbing Bubbles

On A18 of today's WSJ, Betsy McCaughey opines on the discrepancy between the cleanliness standards for restaurants and for hospitals. Surprise! Restaurants are cleaner. Why? Answer: more frequent inspections. Any given eatery can be shut down for "unclean cutting boards and floors, workers who fail to clean their hands, and improper food handling that could lead to bacterial contamination."

L.A. isn't the only city doing this, although it is exemplary: "After L.A. instituted this [once-a-year randomized] inspection system in 1998, the number of people sickened by food-borne illnesses fell 13%, according to the Journal of Environmental Health." However, surprisingly, hospitals don't have these inspections and therefore cause the deaths of many more people:

These infections are caused largely by unclean hands, inadequately cleaned equipment and contaminated clothing that allow bacteria to spread from patient to patient. In a study released in April, Boston University researchers examining 49 operating rooms at four New England hospitals found that more than half the objects that should have been disinfected were overlooked by cleaners.

Something even more (medically) foolish:

Hospitals used to routinely test surfaces for bacteria, but in 1970 the CDC and the American Hospital Association advised them to stop, saying testing was unnecessary. The CDC still adheres to that position despite a 32-fold increase in MRSA infections. CDC officials say that lab capacity should be reserved for tests on patients.

Guess what? Hospitals are only inspected ONCE every THREE years; physicians, because of patient privacy concerns, are not inspected AT ALL unless a spate of diseases occurs. Case in point:

It was serendipitous that a Nassau County, N.Y., health official noticed cases of Hepatitis C and called for an investigation of Dr. Harvey Finkelstein, a Long Island doctor. Dr. Finkelstein allegedly was reusing syringes, contrary to universal precautions, and injected patients with contaminated medications.

According to news reports, one of Dr. Finkelstein's patients is confirmed to have been infected with Hepatitis C, an incurable virus. Over a thousand other patients have been notified by health officials that they could be at risk for Hepatitis C and HIV.

The New York State Department of Health called Dr. Finkelstein's reuse of syringes a "correctable error," and is allowing him to continue to practice under observation.

"Correctable?" Not for the 53-year-old patient infected with Hepatitis C or the many other patients dreading the results of their blood tests. Restaurants are closed for far less.

Washing hands isn't enough. Keep the place clean, for once!

The box may contain more goodies than its surroundings do!

The Informed Reader (B5) scoops the December Harvard Business Review...it appears that brainstorming, especially when applied to businesses, doesn't work as well as it appears it should. Reasons:

• "Very few people are good at developing ideas without receiving guidance and boundaries." Oh--so now we find out that limits are good!
• "More often than not, pushy people dominate brainstorming sessions, while others remain silent." Talkers get the most air time. Shy people don't.
• "Empowered by the mantra that "there are no bad ideas," the session produces random notions along the lines of "Let's paint it blue!" "We can sell it in Germany!" "How about an upscale version?" and "The problem is the sales force." " Sounds like Dilbert!

So there. Ask specific questions, and you'll get good answers. That's why I don't get these articles out of my own head...just from the WSJ.

Ooh...theiw poow sewf-esteem!

On A23 of today's WSJ, by Rebecca Wallace-Segall, is a nice, un-PC article praising "thought competition," a.k.a. individual competitions where students compete on their own individual merits, not on teams. Writing from experience (she teaches an "afterschool writing program" in NY), she in effect mourns the fact that kids in "top-notch New York private schools"--expensive, too, obviously--need the creative writing help at all. She blames "[t]heir schools...offshoots of the 'progressive education' movement" that believes that "'thought competition' is treacherous."

Blame the "psychology and pedagogy researchers" who worry that individual competition might hurt the child's self-esteem. A la "The Incredibles," these are the same people encouraging the celebration of mediocrity--"participation" awards, anyone? These schools allow athletic competitions but not academic ones. Rebecca responds: "Is [teamwork] the only admirable achievement?" Mel Levine, UNC professor and childhood-learning expert, agrees that "the impact of the collaborative education movement has been devastating to an entire generation." (Except the homeschoolers!) Predictably, "older members of Generation Y...expect to be immediate heroes and heroines...grade inflation...to be told what a wonderful job they're doing."

Gah! While I am a slightly younger member of GenY, my parents homeschooled me. Now I have the Puritan ethic firmly implanted in my psyche--no entitlement (without reason, of course! :D) for me!

Give till it tickles!

From a Presbyterian, Margaret M. in Pennsylvania, comes a follow-up letter (A21) to the article featured in this post (third item). The letter's title matches my style exactly: "God Is So Reasonable, Only Asking For 10%." While I don't care to argue some of the finer theological points (e.g. tithing as a "means of grace") of the Presbyterians, I will reprint most of the text...[emphasis mine]

We encourage tithing at our church, not as a legalism, but as a means of grace. Indeed, not just tithing, but what our pastor terms "hilarious generosity"...Why? First, God is worthy of our best. Giving is an act of worship that, at its best, reflects a genuine response to God's many gifts to us, including the gift of his Son. Perhaps the proper question to ask isn't "how much of my income do I need to give to God?" but "of all God has entrusted to me, how much can I justify spending on myself?" Second, the needs are great. It doesn't take much analysis to notice that small shifts in our own consumption can make a huge difference in the lives of many who are in need. Finally, giving, with tithing as a discipline, helps us unhook from the grasp of our materialistic culture. Give until it hurts? No, give until it helps! God's grace, our gratitude, generous giving: a recipe for a life of great freedom and joy.

Of mice and men

The Informed Reader (B9) strikes again, scooping from the December Harper's Magazine. This post, like all the other ones, will be un-PC, so there's really no point in making a label just for that. But I digress. The topic today is about the mice used in laboratories the world over and how scientists are not treating them ethically, whatever that means. Have dominion over the earth, anyone? Oh yes; there's also a scientific concern or two.

• Experiments often cause "suffering to rodents." Yes. And? Disease causes suffering to humans. Which do you want? Your mouse to live, or you to die?
  
• "The cramped housing and isolation of lab mice affect their behavior and minds in ways that make them less reliable as test subjects." So do overcrowded hospitals affect humans. Sure, I'll admit, that is a legit concern. Just don't concentrate wholly on mouse rights.
  
• "The lower value placed on mice also leads to waste -- 70% of male newborns are killed, because researchers mostly prefer calmer female rodents." What's this I hear about female infanticide in certain cultures? What about male infanticide? Start a blogburst or something if you really care about this.
• "Meanwhile, there is evidence mice feel empathy in ways similar to other mammals. While this makes the rodents potentially more valuable for research, it also is an argument for extending the protection of the federal Animal Welfare Act to rodents, [the author] suggests." Yay! Another sentient being to add to the list of human relatives!
  

Grapefruit diet

Sylvia Westphal (D1 today) writes about the flip sides of the "grapefruit effect," namely, detailing how it works to increase the blood levels of various medications.

The problem: that certain "individuals have different levels of an enzyme in the intestines and liver, called CYP3A4, that breaks down drugs before they even have the chance to get into the bloodstream. People with very active CYP3A4 get lower amounts of drugs into their systems than those with low levels of the enzyme."

The solution: "But powerful compounds in the grapefruit called furanocoumarins obliterate CYP3A4 in the gut. The result: More drug gets into the bloodstream. For some anticholesterol statins, for example, taking one tablet with a glass of grapefruit juice "is like taking at least 10 tablets with a glass of water," says David Bailey, a pharmacologist at the University of Western Ontario who discovered the grapefruit effect in the early 1990s." With certain drugs (Lipitor, for example) you don't want that effect; for others (in this article, a weak anticancer compound) it makes all the difference.

It does have a flip side! The completely opposite effect...

Meanwhile, the grapefruit continues to surprise the scientific community. Recently, another class of compounds in the fruit was found to block a different set of proteins in the intestine known as "transporters." These transporter proteins actively shuttle drugs from the gut into the bloodstream. Blocking these transporters prevents some drugs from entering the system. This finding may mean that grapefruit is contraindicated with certain drugs for a whole new set of reasons.

Moral: Don't try this at home. Drink your grapefruit juice and take your meds, but not together, at least for now.

Pink poison

On A1 today, by Sebastian Moffett: an article chronicling the Nomura Jellyfish invasion of Japan, a.k.a. an exercise in alliteration for me! These amusing-but-scary 450-pound (!) pink monsters are evidently multiplying because of stupid fishermen, aggravating the problem. Overfishing of algae-consuming sea life has led to fewer fishy secondary consumers of that algae, leaving that much more for the tentacled terrors. Also, by using their infamous toxic tentacles, the slimies slay the fish, diminishing the market attractiveness of their victims, explains one fisherman: "When their mouths are wide open, it means they've died going, 'I'm in pain! I'm in pain!' "

However, these blasted blobs have spurred the seafood market in another direction: jellyfish Jello Jigglers!

One coastal firm, Tango Jersey Dairy, has for the past three years produced 2,000 or 3,000 cartons of vanilla-and-jellyfish ice cream. The jellyfish is soaked overnight in milk to reduce its smell, and is then diced. Fumiko Hirabayashi, a director of the dairy, says the jelly cubes are slightly chewy. Jellyfish is also getting publicity in women's magazines because it contains collagen, a protein used in cosmetics.

Scientists, predictably, are hypothesizing about the causes of this population explosion and are capitalizing on the opportunity to learn more about this jellyfish. Hypothesis one: "a computer model of...suggests the jellyfish are breeding off the Chinese coast near the mouth of the Yangtze River." Number two: "[P]ollution, perhaps linked to industrialization in China, is helping create more algae in the sea. The algae are food for plankton, which is food for jellyfish." Number three: blaming "the Three Gorges Dam, the world's largest hydroelectric-power project under construction in the Yangtze, which could be changing water flows to the sea. A dam in a section of the Danube that runs between Serbia and Romania completed in 1972 changed the river flow, after which the jellyfish population of the Black Sea exploded."

The fishermen are also having fun slaying the slayers, either with pronged poles ("three or more bits" ensures that they'll get eaten by other sea predators) or with a "large potato masher" in their nets. Yum!

And we all know that since global warming is happening and that we'll all die, we surely have no doubt as to the accuracy of these computer models...

Apes: luckier-than-thou

Ahhh...evolution must be wholly true after all! According to Dec. 3 The New Yorker (Informed Reader, B4), "damaged remnants of retroviruses make up about 8% of the human genome." As if that weren't enough, "[m]any of those viral fragments are shared with chimpanzees and monkeys." Dude! Second cousin to a chimp! Well, at least we're different from apes in one respect...

A recent experiment showed that humans have developed an effective defense against an extinct retrovirus, called PtERV (pronounced "pea-terv"). Chimpanzees haven't. The experiment suggested that this lack of a defense against one retrovirus actually makes chimpanzees immune to the effects of another, HIV.

Yeah, that's evolution in action, all right. So successful that it protects us from stuff that went extinct *millions* of years ago. Go figure...the intelligent designer ain't so smart when it comes to humans, eh?

Drowning in thankfulness...

Being outraged at the atrocities committed against a group of rehabilitating troops over in England, I figured I might as well post the notable locations of various takes on this.

First: Michelle Malkin (it gets the most hits, apparently).

Next: Aurora (thanks very much for the article on this!).

Next: MK (nice snarky take).

Finally: The Lone Voice (pardon the language a bit. Not such a lone voice after all, eh?).

Think of it! A citizen actually being ungrateful for our troops! Support just went out the window for this lady. So much for wanting the best for the troops...so much for wartime sacrifices.

The minichurch effect

On Nov. 23, Kyle Wingfield wrote about his personal, mini-church (at least it comes off as that) experience in Europe (W11). He suggests that Christianity on the Continent has less to do today with "[o]ld ladies sitting in otherwise empty churches" than with "smaller groups in cafés and restaurants" - i.e. conventicles? He gives two reasons for this style of meeting: first, that the church (Well in Brussels) doesn't have its own building yet; and second, that a coffee shop is less "intimidating" for the unchurched who happen to stumble upon a service in progress. This is apparently popular in Europe right now, where only 15% (versus 44% here) regularly worship somewhere other than a mosque etc.

In response, Thomas D. in Plymouth, Mich. wrote (A9, Nov. 24) a letter defending classical Christianity. While claiming that Wingfield's article "falls prey to a common fallacy, that of setting up a straw man for classical Christian beliefs and practices (passe, formulaic, anti-intellectual) and then suggesting these are the reasons for its demise, or replacement by more relevant spiritual movements," he sticks in a nice paraphrase of G.K. Chesterton: "[T]raditional Christian beliefs have not been intellectually examined and found wanting, they have been caricatured and left unexamined."

In closing: "When one rationally and objectively views current events and culture, it is classical Christianity that is nouveau, even rebellious. The "well spring" of classical Christianity still provides spiritual refreshment to those with the courage and discipline to seek it." - Thomas D.

Hairballs! (warning: slightly gross pictures)

A friend sent me two interesting (to me, anyway!) sites concerning giant hairballs, a.k.a. bezoars, human and otherwise. Mostly human.

Doctors untangle the strange case of the giant hairball!

Examples of various types of bezoars from cattle, humans, mummies, etc.

The "omnivore" label is tongue-in-cheek, obviously--the first person ate, well, anything!

Three biology links

Aurora had another excellent post today that is scary, satisfying, and oddly humorous, all rolled into one. Apparently another rabid environmentalist is trying to increase the baby gap between normal and...abnormal people, all in the name of Gaia.

On the topic of embryonic stem cell research, I discovered this post by MK. Nice conservative view. Also check out this post by The Stiletto re the "legality" of life at conception.

We're winning in Iraq? Surely you jest!

As before: No, you do not jest.

On page A18 of today's WSJ: another article of hope about the Iraq War. Is the *mainstream* media reporting this stuff?

Robert H. Scales spent a week with General Petraeus in Iraq, and in this article ("Petraeus's Iraq") he shares a very important happening: the "culminating point," which he says and demonstrates is "psychological, not physical, happenings." His definition: "The culminating point marks the shift in advantage from one side to the other, when the outcome becomes irreversible: The potential loser can inflict casualties, but has lost all chance of victory. The only issue is how much longer the war will last, and what the butcher's bill will be." Exactly. Here are some more quotes:

To bolster local security within Baghdad...in May, [Petraeus] began arraying combat units in four successive "belts" around Baghdad. These units painfully ejected al Qaeda influence from the suburbs and satellite cities, effectively choking off reinforcements...

The U.S. operation, called Arrowhead Ripper...was an intelligence-driven battle with precise information, gleaned from overhead surveillance using unmanned aircraft, signals intercepts and willing Iraqis who came forward. The combat was sharp and at times furious. American casualties rose in late June; the enemy fought knowing full well that losing Baquba would force them to retreat...

To be sure, Baghdad and the surrounding belts are not yet safe. But culminating points are psychological events. What I witnessed firsthand in Iraq was a shift in opinions and a transfer of will among Iraqis, not a classic military takedown. This change was palpable and unmistakable...

Gens. Petraeus and Ray Odierno have achieved success on the ground at an unprecedented speed in the history of counterinsurgency warfare. Now it's time to apply the same sense of urgency and commitment to the task of reuniting the tragically fractured nation and bring it back from the brink of annihilation.

And to reach the culminating point with the American public. With the Left's stranglehold on the media (though a staunch Democrat I know insists that the Republicans have a "stranglehold" on it...wonder where he's getting his news!), this may take even longer. No media is better than wrong media.

Stem cell hope

The WSJ (A1) features an article about stem cells, news of which was out on AP yesterday. Gautam Naik reports on this advance that "avoids destroying embryos."

Japan and U.S. researchers have separately come up with a way to create cells that behave just like embryonic ones (able to differentiate into any kind of cell in the body) out of a clever combination of retroviruses and skin cells. Retroviruses are special kinds of viruses that have been used in the past (as in this case) to replace the DNA of the cell they enter. Scientists can take four genes, insert them into a retrovirus, and inject those viruses into a skin cell harvested from the patient.

The good: This eliminates the dual ethical/moral issues of cloning and destruction of embryos; the technique theoretically has all the advantages of embryonic stem cells, with few of the disadvantages. The cells would also come from the patient, so the risk of immune rejection is minimal.

The bad: This is still theoretical. Also, retroviruses have been "linked with cancer," as have embryonic stem cells, which are prone to generate tumors.

Science fiction, rather

As you will shortly see from this Informed Reader blurb (B10; December Scientific American), I used the "scientific method" label quite sarcastically and tongue-in-cheek. "Scientists," not content to believe/know that Earth is the only hospitable planet for life in at least the solar system, are trying to find proof of an "alien encounter" - i.e. "life has emerged twice on this planet." Physicist Paul Davies (AZ State University) says that the "most likely survivors from a first wave of life would be microbes, microscopic organisms like bacteria." Why? They have "no connection" to the currently accepted tree of life (accepted by the shrinking majority, at least) and they probably live in "extreme conditions...such as the bone-dry valleys of Antarctica, California's extremely alkaline Mono Lake or heavily polluted rivers such as Spain's Rio Tinto."

I've got one tiny problem with the last one: if these extreme microbes likely live in rivers that are polluted today, where would they have lived back when the planet was young and water sources were pristine?

Monopoly on freedom?

The Informed Reader (B8) scoops today from the November-December Mental Floss...about Monopoly! Normally I can't stand playing that game, especially with money-hungry siblings, but this could be an exception. Something to think about for this and future wars? Emphasis mine.

The board game "Monopoly" served allied prisoners as a real-life tool to get out of jail during World War II, says Brian McMahon in Mental Floss, a magazine of farflung trivia.

In 1941, the British secret service asked the game's British licensee John Waddington Ltd. to add secret extras to some sets, which the Red Cross delivered to prisoners of war. These included a metal file, compass and silk maps of safe houses (silk, because it folds into small spaces and unfolds silently). Even better, real French, German and Italian currency was hidden under the game's fake money. Soldiers and pilots were told that if they were captured they should look out for the special editions, identified by a red dot in the game's "Free Parking" space.

Of the 35,000 prisoners of war who escaped German prison camps, "more than a few of those certainly owe their breakout to the classic board game," says Mr. McMahon.

Unholy trinity

A testimony and a warning to the limits of science: this post by Aurora. Apparently scientists are willing to do nearly anything to satisfy the cravings of carnal mankind. Not only is this manipulating genetics to satisfy alternative lifestyles and psychological orientations, it's another scary step to 1984...or 2084...or sooner.

Last chance for DDT, indeed

Two letters in the WSJ today (A17) comment on "Last Chance for DDT" by Roger Bate (which I archived...a compilation post should be forthcoming). Emphasis mine.

• Hans Overgaard, PhD (Norway), co-author of the article upon which Bate commented, emphasizes "that a single, silver-bullet solution, such as DDT, to control malaria is not realistic. As Mr. Bate himself states, DDT is not a panacea. Instead, several types of interventions are needed in an integrated approach to vector management. Despite the good track record of DDT in controlling malaria, we need to find alternative control options because evolutionary forces predispose DDT resistance. In addition, the persistence of DDT in the environment affects non-target organisms as well as food and water supplies...A recent study reported in Medscape Today showed that high levels of serum DDT predicted a statistically significant five-fold increased risk of breast cancer among women who were born after 1931."
• Don M. in Sherman, TX, offers contrary examples about DDT's harmfulness. "I happen to be a survivor of DDT. I grew up on a farm in the '30s, '40s, and '50s. We had about 25 milk cows, several pig sows and many young piglets, horses, and many free range chickens. We also had an outhouse...We sprayed the cows in the milk barn, the pig pens, the horse barn and the out house. We sprayed the window screen at the house and porch but not in the house. The results were fantastic. The flies and mosquitoes disappeared...We, as well as every one else, drank the milk from cows that were sprayed with DDT. I am 76 years old and have suffered no ill effects from DDT. My three sisters and brother have not had any illnesses related to DDT. My schoolmates, neighbors and friends were all exposed to DDT and all have lived normal lives."

As always, DDT is like any other poison, to borrow the old maxim. Depends on the dose. What I am surprised at is WHY does no one seem to advocate a middle ground? Responsible DDT usage? Don't trust Rachel Carson--trust unbiased studies.

Dumb blondes...

In The Informed Reader (B6) was an interesting new take on the "dumb blonde" concept. As a strawberry blonde myself, I couldn't resist!

• According to Britain's Sunday Times, "[m]en's mental performance drops in the presence of blonde women, apparently because of the perceived link of dumbness with blondness."
• "The study adds to a body of research of how stereotypes affect peoples' behavior. Other similar research has shown people walk and talk more slowly in front of the elderly."

Ha! However, the fundamental question doesn't seem to have been answered: are blondes really dumb? There's plenty of empirical data saying they aren't.

Appearance

According to Blogthings, my blog should be green...but I still like the format as is. Any votes for changing the layout?

Your blog is smart and thoughtful - not a lot of fluff.
You enjoy a good discussion, especially if it involves picking apart ideas.
However, you tend to get easily annoyed by any thoughtless comments in your blog.

What Color Should Your Blog or Journal Be?
http://blogthings.com/whatcolorshouldyourblogorjournalbequiz/

Percentage, shmercentage!

According to http://glassbooth.org/, my support for Huckabee is somewhat justified. The site is essentially a two-part quiz. Part 1: Weight the issues most important to you with more points (20 points total; you must use them all). Part 2: Mark whether you support or oppose (on a 5-point continuum) various issues. The site will then rank the presidential candidates in order of percent similarity to your beliefs.

A bit surprising: Fred Thompson (84% similarity) came out first, McCain (80%) second. Huckabee was fifth, with a mere 75%.

Then I did an item analysis.
Thompson's top similarities ("very similar") were Taxes and Budget, Abortion and Birth Control, Gay Rights, Iraq and Foreign Policy, and Education.
McCain's order of "very similar" items was a bit different: Taxes and Budget, Gun Control, Abortion and Birth Control, Iraq and Foreign Policy, and Civil Liberties and Domestic Security. Huckabee's "very" similarities were Taxes and Budget, Gay Rights, Civil Liberties and Domestic Security, and Abortion and Birth Control.

Hmm. I guess it all depends how you weight things...obviously. I have actually been considering Thompson, given several negative editorials about Huckabee. However, given the amount of headway we would have to make on abortion, tackling gay rights seems easier right now. Any thoughts?

Three odd things about me*

The second and third quizzes are actually fairly close! As for the first -- I've always thought I was a tomboy, but not quite this much!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

***You Are 45% Feminine, 55% Masculine*** [Again, this relies on stereotypes, but it's still a little disquieting.]

You are in touch with both your feminine and masculine sides.
You're sensitive at the right times, but you don't let your emotions overwhelm you.
You're not a eunuch, just the best of both genders.

Are You Masculine or Feminine?
http://blogthings.com/areyoumasculineorfemininequiz/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

***You Are Likely A Forth [sic] Born*** [Actually, I'm third of four.]

At your darkest moments, you feel angry.
At work and school, you do best when your analyzing.
When you love someone, you tend to be very giving.

In friendship, you don't take the initiative in reaching out.
Your ideal jobs are: factory jobs, comedy, and dentistry. [Dentistry, maybe. What about teaching? Blogthings is giving me mixed signals here.]
You will leave your mark on the world with your own personal philosophy.

The Birth Order Predictor
http://blogthings.com/birthorderpredictorquiz/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

***You Will Not Be a Cool Parent*** [whatever "cool" means. Baby boomer? Amoral?]

And that's pretty okay. While your kids may not think of you as a friend, they will respect you.
You know that kids need discipline and structure, and you're not afraid to give it to them.
Just be careful that your strictness doesn't lead to rebellion.
It's good to have standards and rules, but you don't need to have an iron fist when enforcing them.

Would You Be a Cool Parent?
http://blogthings.com/wouldyoubeacoolparentquiz/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*Again, this has nothing to do with "Seven True Things About Me."

Ahh...pork, my favorite!, part II

Woohoo! The opposite political party is doing something useful, albeit reluctantly! A10 today (Review and Outlook): "Divided They Cut." This article tried to follow the Democrat logic...

• "Whatever the argument over Iraq, Democrats campaigned loudly as more responsible fiscal stewards and promised to scrub down Capitol Hill. Now back in power, however, they are reverting to their tax and spending habits." Hmmm...makes you worried, right? Read on!
  
• "Mr. Bush is exercising his veto power, and Democrats don't seem to have the votes for overrides. On Thursday, Congress failed to reverse Mr. Bush's rejection of the overstuffed Labor-HHS-Education appropriation. If divided government ends up producing spending restraint, it will be a rare moment of fiscal virtue." Ironic...can a Congress divided against itself stand for America?
• "There's a lesson here in the importance of the Presidency, since Congress obviously won't police itself. Mr. Bush's great mistake was that he never said no to Republican spending monarchs like Jerry Lewis and Roy Blunt. If he's now curbing Democrats David Obey and Kent Conrad, Mr. Bush is doing what he should have done all along." Rats. At least Bush is reforming now.
• "Democrats say their increases are urgent for pent-up domestic priorities, but that doesn't square with the pork. Typical is a $3 million earmark inserted by South Carolina Democrat James E. Clyburn -- in the defense appropriation signed this week by Mr. Bush -- for youth programs at the James E. Clyburn Golf Center. Also typical is $301,500 for the International Peace Garden, in Dunsieth, North Dakota, courtesy of Mr. Conrad." Yeah, we really need more, better, younger golfers. Just the thing to help the working man.
• "Then there's the Democrats' favorite game of three-card monte, that military spending in Iraq and the larger war on terror is somehow displacing domestic social programs. But Iraq hardly presents some unique or overwhelming fiscal burden. As a percentage of the total federal budget, the U.S. is spending relatively little on defense, even including the Iraq supplemental currently jammed up in Congressional feuding." Yes, money is limited, not infinite, and a bigger slice of the pie may necessitate the shrinking of other slices. But the "war" slice is shrinking...go figure.
• "Democrats are planning to suture together the remaining appropriations into an "omnibus" bill that will split the $22 billion difference between Congress and Mr. Bush. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says that surgery would involve "some tremendously difficult cuts." We can only imagine." Hey, another reference to surgery (see previous post)! And you can't beat that last sentence.