The Sunday after Labor Day, Husband and I started a class at church on Surprised by Hope by N. T. Wright. I had read this back in May to prepare. Since then, we have facilitated 7 sessions. Where are we now?
The Pick
What is heaven after all? Wright contends that too many Christians have a Platonic idea of heaven. They conceive of it in ethereal terms, as if we float in a bodiless state in some transcendent realm. Indeed, most Christians think of heaven as “up there,” and as separated from the earth. What the Scriptures teach, however, is that heaven will come to earth. The Scriptures do not say, according to Wright, that we will “go to heaven when we die,” but that heaven will come to earth, that the earth upon which we live will be transformed, and that we will enjoy the new creation.
The Plan
Part 1 - Setting the Scene
- All Dressed Up and No Place to Go? (confusion about what Christianity means by the Resurrection)
- Puzzled About Paradise? (confusion about heaven and the afterlife)
- Early Christian Hope in its Historical Setting
- The Strange Story of Easter (chapters 3 and 4 are a condensation of one of Wright's 800-page books)
The People
- What the fact of inspiration of Scripture really means (simple to complex)
- Willingness to engage in the historical context behind the text
- (Mathematical/Christian) Platonism and Aristotelianism
- Pietism and implications for practice of one's faith and witness
The Progress
Major Topics
- Hymns do teach theology.
- People's lack of attention to the words they sing does not invalidate this general point.
- Yes, hymns are expressed as poetry, and should be interpreted as such.
- No, not all lyrics are the same.
- Two hymns that express resurrection theology very closely to the Scriptural view are For All the Saints and Jerusalem the Golden.
- Bodily resurrection is a core belief of Christianity.
- Only Jews, Christians, and (after 800s AD) Zoroastrians believed in a post-death body.
- We've gotten through 3 of 7 mutations that Christians made to the Jewish doctrine of life-after-death.
- Mutation #1: early Christianity, unlike Judaism, had a single view of life after death
- Mutation #2: early Christianity, unlike Judaism, treated bodily resurrection as a central belief on which other beliefs hang
- Mutation #3: early Christianity explained the resurrection body clearly and emphaticaly as both physical, and transformed, and Spirit-powered (against a common mistranslation of 1 Corinthians 15:44)
- Irenaeus articulated this view in AD 180.
- Physical bodies of resurrected people mean that this creation matters (2 Corinthians 6:14)
- Political implications of this can be explored in (among other places) Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, followed by One Faith No Longer.
- Eyewitness accounts are important to the Gospels' texts.
- If multiple people witnessed an event, their accounts are expected to diverge, potentially in many details.
- At the same time, core details' agreement across accounts roughly reflect the degree of certainty we can take in knowing what happened.
- These accounts typically undergirded ancient biography as a genre, which took a very different approach from contemporary biography (which resolves many of the apparent differences in the Gospels). Around the same time, Thucidydes described how he "recorded" speeches based on interviews.
Interesting Asides
- Inspiration of Scripture
- How do we know about it? Do we just "feel" that the whole corpus of Scripture is inspired?
- What does this mean? Did God dictate the words to all biblical writers (closer to Islam's view) or did He more so inspire the thoughts that the human writers put their best-at-the-time words to? (Check out Paul's side note in 1 Corinthians 1:16.)
- Is it more important to believe in the inspiration of Scripture before or after one believes in Jesus Christ as Savior?
- John 1 and 19 were likely written especially to combat docetism (proto-Gnosticism)
- Jesus' divinity
- Not the same as messiahship!
- At least to the peoples at the time, not shown by His resurrection necessarily, but by other evidence
- Hermeneutical methods
- One way is rectilinear--i.e., that for each Old Testament prophecy there is exactly one fulfillment of that prophecy (either "now" or "not yet" but not both). This was embraced by many of the Reformers because it was opposite of what the Roman Catholic church taught at that time.
- Another way is typological--i.e., for a given OT prophecy there are multiple possible fulfillments (both "now" and "not yet").
No comments:
Post a Comment