Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Un-charismatic analysis of charisma

Behold, it is a great mystery. So saith Joseph Nye, Jr. in an op-ed today, analyzing the Obama phenomenon in particular while barely naming names. After asking whether "charisma originate[s] in the individual, in the followers, or in the situation," he explores some research behind it.

First: "Charisma proves surprisingly hard to identify in advance" - because, according to political consultant Dick Morris, it doesn't actually exist. It may be evanescent depending on the success of a given *charismatic* individual. As a result of this non-existence, so to speak, "charisma scales that predict votes...have not proven fruitful." In addition, it is often used after-the-fact. Proverbial nonexistence can lead to more unfortunate consequences: "In practice, the word charisma is a vague synonym for 'personal magnetism'" (emphasis added).

In the end, says Nye, it's all in the nonverbal communication. This *unscientific* (non-measurable, non-predictable) phenomenon of charisma may have more effect in elections than other, *scientific*, factors such as the strength of the economy. What does this mean? Answer: Science isn't everything.

3 comments:

No Compromise said...

Yes, it's how well one can emotionalize an audience isn't it? Is that a word? Well, if it isn't it is now.

If one can rev up people to an experiential state then the rever is charismatic. It's all about emotions doncha know?!

I think I made two new words for my new New World Order Dictionary. Check out my blog for the answer to that mystery.

Haven't heard from you for awhile. I hope all is well with you sister!

http://gto7.wordpress.com

WomanHonorThyself said...

youre so right!..how this racist has charisma though is beyond me Hannah!!

Hannah J said...

Thanks, NC and WHT. Just for future reference, though, I wouldn't want to call Obama a racist, even with good reason - there's always a small risk of that becoming an ad-hominem argument, which I want to shy away from.